Artist: Kim Anderson
Title: The First Kiss
Media: Poster
Dimensions: 40.6 x 50.8 cm
Date: January 9, 1999
Biography info:
Kim Anderson was born in Germany in 1959. His real name is
Bertram Bahner. Bahner was a successful European photographer long before the
Kim Anderson series. He started his career in Germany at the age of 22 and
focused on fashion, people, and photography for advertisement agencies. He also
would take photographs of his daughter Nicola and son Manuel playing with their
friends; doing so he discovered the universal feelings of tenderness and
innocence of childhood. He is now known for his simple black and white
photography and hand coloring.
Statement on the work:
To the child, Love is both real and a pretense: a necessity sometimes, a
role at other times; instinctive, yet learned behavior. I see my little girl
offering her hand to be kissed, in a very la-di-da manner. She is trying on the
gallantries of love, just as she tries on the petulance of childhood. How
quickly they master the social codes of love, hugs, and kisses, and hearts - as
quickly as they learn to manipulate the heartstrings by refusing such tokens.
All around children, there are cultural signals, prompts to express and receive
love: in fairy tales, it is the ultimate reward for being discovered as who you
really are, the beauty under the cinders, the prince beneath the frog. In
advertisements, every product sold with the promise that its purchase will
bring or enhance true love.
At the same time that these diaphanous romantic feelings are being planted,
there is the hot, urgent need of the child to be listened to, have needs
attended to, right away. "Mommy I need a pair of scissors ANTZ is coming
out on videotape. I'm hungry I pooped in my pants change me no stupid daddy not
that kind of crayon the other kind!" All demands are on the same plane of
importance, and worthy of tears. The child does not prioritize but asks only to
be obeyed, pronto - with all die respect to the "magic words" please
and thank you, those road-bump nuisance placed by parents, who are slow-witted
and don't understand that they are your servants. It's frustrating sometimes
that they won't acknowledge it; they do so much for you as it is, why won't
they just come clean and admit they are you abject slaves? And in return you
love them, distractedly, wholeheartedly, ambivalently ("I hate you Mommy!
I'll never kiss you again for the rest of my life!") and in the best
possible way, organically, like a heliotrope plant.
So your first love as a child is for your parents. They thermodynamic model
seems to be: love in, love out. If the parents' love has been expressed
cleanly, without mixed messages or scary anger or abandonment (it almost never
is, the psychologists tell us), the child will grow up into a serene,
unconflicted adult; and if there are complications (there almost always are),
the child will probably grow up to have "unresolved issues." But some
confusion is inevitable: before you even reach kindergarten, you may very well
have conceived the idea of marrying one of your parents later on (and why not?
- he/she is so conveniently present, so attractively devoted to your needs);
and you may have experienced jealous annoyance at their displays of affection
to each other. As my four-year-old daughter Lily said to me this morning, when
I had the nerve to kiss her mother in front of her, "That was the longest,
rudest kiss I ever saw!"
My daughter went through a quandary around the time she turned three. Who
should she marry? she began to fret. I was an early candidate, I am happy to
say. She enjoyed slow-dancing with me to Ella Fitzgerald and got a dreamy look
in her eyes when I held her aloft in my arms. But she accepted (all too
sanguinely, it seemed to me) the information that she could not marry her daddy
because it just wasn't done.
So her attention turned to other suitors. Her principal beam was the boy
next door, Dominick. This kid is a lout. He barely speaks except to grunt, he
is fixated on trucks, he regularly gets into trouble at play school for
fighting. I tell you frankly, he is beneath my daughter in intelligence and
deportment. Yet she professes to love him and plans to marry him. She tells me
he will not always be so wild, he will make a good man when he grows up. He
seems to possess that masculine je ne said quoi, that essence of
machismo that even four-year-old girls are attuned to. I try to interest her in
the more intellectual boys in her circle, but she pays them no mind. I will say
this for young Dominick: he does seem to behave better around Lily, and, in his
own way, appears fond of her. Still, I wonder how to protect her from the pain
of unrequited love.
The other day, Lily wanted to go to the neighborhood park because she
thought Dominick might be there. "He loves the park, almost as much as he
loves me," she said confidently. When we finally caught up with him, he
seemed, from my vantage point, to ignore her - tearing back and forth on his
bike, while she pretend he was chasing her. When she got tired of running from
his approach, she sat on a bench and watch him. She was in no way put off by
his self-absorption; rather she seemed able to weave his mere presence into her
ongoing fantasy that he is crazy about her.
When she first began asking "Who should I marry?" I was not the only
one to tell the question might be a little premature. Our assurances did
nothing to quell her sense of urgency. Obviously she had reached a development
stage in her own mind when the act of deciding about something big - the choice
of a life partner - had to be undertaken, at least in practice. I knew where
some of the romantic suspense was coming from. She had chronically watched five
different versions of Cinderella on tape from Betty Boop to Brandy, then
had graduated to obsessions with The Sound of Music, Funny Face, Gigi, and My
Fair Lady. One day, she remarked, like a precocious narratologist, "You
know, they're all the same story." It was true: in each variation, a lowly
girl had been plucked from the chorus, so to speak, to marry the top man.
A few other candidates for Lily's hand had to be evaluated. Lily's
great-uncle Reuben regularly proposed that they run away and get married, but
he was over seventy and has a hearing aid; and besides, there was Aunt
Florence, his wife of forty-five years, to consider. Then her pediatrician,
Doctor Monti, expressed interest, but he was always so busy. No, it would have
to be Dominick. Now that dilemma was settled, Lily began mulling over her
wedding gown, tiara, pumps, jewels, boa, tutu. Wedding announcements would have
to be sent out, ribbon bows tied, handwriting of name practice. She began to
tell everyone who came to visit; "I have a boyfriend name Dominick and
we're going to get married."
Did this mean that she was infatuated with Dominick? On the contrary, during
this time she had little contact with the actual boy, nor did she seem to want
more. Meanwhile, I witnessed her daily eruption of intense feelings for another
love object altogether: her cat, Newman. She could not get enough of catching
him, snuggling with him, holding him captive by the paws, tying kerchiefs on
his head, strapping blankets to his body, tormenting him in every possible
fashion, and sobbing when he ran away. Here, I thought, was the real thing:
love without the romantic gauze, but with the cruelty and appetite of
attraction that one sees in film noir. She would kill for him - or kill him!
How often my wife and I have had to intervene to protect the creature, removing
from his neck harnesses and cravats that could have easily turned into nooses.
Yet he always comes back to her, like the poor sap Glenn Ford used to play in
those films noir, for more punishment. He craves her attention; and she, in
turn, related to him fearlessly, accepting whatever scratches may come her way.
Lily loves Newman in a deep, passionate manner. It is like a cross between
her instinctual, inadvertent love for her parents and her elective affinity for
the little boyfriend next door. Thought the Abyssinian has been with her all
her life, her feelings have increasingly focused on and matured toward him: she
talks to him regularly as though he were her child, her honey, her one and
only. The problem is that Newman is twenty years old - ancient by cat
standards. Already he is arthritic, cataract, and worrisomely skinny. He sleeps
for much of the day, curled up in a ball, until Lily comes around to prod him
into motion. As parents, we can try to protect our child from viciousness and
harm, but not from the consequences of tender attachment. We shudder to think
of what will happen when he dies. Then she will really know the sorrow that is
so often inextricable from first love.
Essay by Phillip Lopate
Background info on the work:
The romantic appeal of The First Kiss is universal,
hand-printed in black and white and the hand-colored rose.
Connects to theme and why I chose it:
This image connects
to the theme of love because it shows the tenderness of the first kiss. This
photograph takes me back to childhood and then reminds me of my first kiss and
when I first fell in love. It may also show how by imitating their parents
children might be portraying how they feel they should act when they get older.
Overall it is a sense of love.
No comments:
Post a Comment